Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
There was a confidence vote read here: http://montreal.ctv.ca/servlet...
And Ignatieff will be tabling a non-confidence vote in October as per same article.
Please clarify one thing: is the article supposed to be a news piece or an opinion piece? It should be clearly indicated as to which it is or perhaps the editor does not understand the difference.
And Ignatieff will be tabling a non-confidence vote in October as per same article.
Please clarify one thing: is the article supposed to be a news piece or an opinion piece? It should be clearly indicated as to which it is or perhaps the editor does not understand the difference.
Not before September 9th, when Ignatieff met the ethnic media.
Control your own facts.
Control your own facts.
I stand corrected. Most online news cycles are measured in minutes - I didn't realize the Eesti Elu news cycle was 2 weeks long!
Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: Yet again (12:00)
If you had chosen to look even more closely, Raudkivi's article was identified as coming from the print version, not online. The print version comes out once a week, covering material from the previous one: there is your two week timeline. Wonder why you are so quick to criticize, without delving into the actual story. Mud-slinging is to no-one's benefit in our already divided community.
I don't get it - do you wait around for the print version to come out before you post a story here? How does that make any sense?
Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: Yet again (12:00), Sorry (12:33)
Guess you are not a subscriber. From a business perspective it would be silly to post something for free online before it had appeared in the paid, print issue. Just guessing here, but that would be the rationale for identifying print articles as such online - perhaps get new subscribers? Then again, seeing as some seem to know all about how Eesti Elu online operates, perhaps you could illuminate readers here? Thanks for your time and positive contribution!
Should you really be commenting on business acumen in this context?
Why would I or anyone else subscribe to the paper version just to get stale opinion pieces about Canadian politicians?
There's no need for you to fear constructive criticism.
Why would I or anyone else subscribe to the paper version just to get stale opinion pieces about Canadian politicians?
There's no need for you to fear constructive criticism.
Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.