Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
First I came to the part where it says:
Of course it is possible that Kasekamp is right.
and I thought maybe finally Mr. Söödor has become at least somewhat ojective. Then I came to the part where he says:
readers often tend to accept the distorted and prejudicial claims of careless writers at face value.
and I realized that nothing has changed.
Makes me wish Mr. Parming was still around to put Mr. Söödor in his place.
Part 9 ... to be continued ... how much longer must us readers be subjected to this hatchet job masquerading as a review?
Of course it is possible that Kasekamp is right.
and I thought maybe finally Mr. Söödor has become at least somewhat ojective. Then I came to the part where he says:
readers often tend to accept the distorted and prejudicial claims of careless writers at face value.
and I realized that nothing has changed.
Makes me wish Mr. Parming was still around to put Mr. Söödor in his place.
Part 9 ... to be continued ... how much longer must us readers be subjected to this hatchet job masquerading as a review?
Is it not about time, that the editors of Eesti Elu did their job on this one and actually did some editing?
Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.