Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
Lp hr "ajalugu"... wrong Bush. Your link refers to George H. W. Bush. The article is about his son, George W. Bush.
Ja veel: The book was criticized by author David Neiwert, who noted:
Like most Larouche texts, the Bush "biography" is a mélange of fact and distortion, written in a highly suppositional style that makes numerous leaps of logic and asserts connections where there is no real evidence to support it, at other times omitting exculpatory or contrary information that reveals a more complete picture. Sifting through it requires a great deal of work, but there are nuggets of fact woven into their text that are substantiated and which deserve proper consideration.
Like most Larouche texts, the Bush "biography" is a mélange of fact and distortion, written in a highly suppositional style that makes numerous leaps of logic and asserts connections where there is no real evidence to support it, at other times omitting exculpatory or contrary information that reveals a more complete picture. Sifting through it requires a great deal of work, but there are nuggets of fact woven into their text that are substantiated and which deserve proper consideration.
Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: Toomas Merilo (18:49)
skull and bones is skull and bones = working in the same hierarchy
Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: ajalugu (10:40)
Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.