Is it possible the groups who persuaded governments in Europe from 1996 to 2008 to ban debate on the Holocaust didn't want free debate because they had guilty consciences and knew their lies would be revealed to the public in the media and over the internet.


Banning a particular version of history is usually a sign of a guilty conscience,

Mr. Lucas again is working feverously to stay on the right side of his Zionist masters at The Economist.

If as he says, “The best antidote to Holocaust denial is truth, such as the excellent nizkor.org …” then his sense for historic truth should be piqued when the ‘4 million deaths plaque at Auschwitz was removed and replaced with one that stated ‘1.1 million deaths’. Horrific in any case, but does Mr. Lucas really want to research for the historic truth? http://ftp.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/...

To ensure he will continue to earn his pay, he adds the following throw away comment, “An enterprising group of researchers ought to provide a similar dossier to rebut the equally absurd claims of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists.” Interesting that he does not take advantage of the research that has already been done by thousands of scientists and other experts.
http://www.voltairenet.org/art...

Mr. Lucas is part of the 100% of the mainstream media who do not question the ‘official’ 9/11 story, thus staying employed to hector us with their version of the truth. When US surveys show that over 40% of Americans believe parts of their government is involved in the 9/11 cover-up, (another 10% is unsure), why does he not help search for the truth, or does he fear he will lose his well paying position?
http://www.911truth.org/page.p...