Estonians trapped in stereotypes: Collaborator or victim? (IV)
Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
< 1  2  
to maxim15 Dec 2005 08:37
"Peter is to be commended for his principled stand on not letting politcal correctnes trample on basic individual freedoms."

Isn't that your phrase, Maxim? How about a little help with it. It seems you want to communicate with us, so try to be a little more cooperative. Otherwise, people might start thinking that your a head-case.
Maxim15 Dec 2005 11:51
If you'd kindly read the comment again, and then refer to the name on the masthead, you'll find that it isn't Maxim. I would appreciate it very much if people din't get on their high horse and start to pin me with a stake to the wall whenever they see a comment that just narrowly misses their point of view, attributing the comment automatically to me! I've heard of Estonians eating other Estonians for lunch, but this is too ridiculous for words. It just goes to show that even you mere mortal critic are capable of your own brand of mistakes.
Maxim can't read15 Dec 2005 13:54
.


.
Anonymous15 Dec 2005 15:10
It was not Maxim. The Estonian phrase I was not able to understand was
"veisevaljaheited".
Anonymous15 Dec 2005 16:41
veise=bovine
väljaheited=excrement
veiseväljaheited=bullshit
Maxim can't read15 Dec 2005 17:43
Maxim's nemisis said: "I'll never read another word that you write. No, not even the inevitable response to this message."

Maxim responds with, " Hey, wow-I even get one last message."

concerned16 Dec 2005 05:10
How does the second to last paragraph of this article with its marginally acceptable English tie in with the statements made by Estonian Prime Minister on May 8, 2005 at the site of the former concentration camp at Klooga, Estonia? To me it suggests that EKN is biased in its outlook. This may not be deliberate as over the decades it has become ossified as the average age of its members crept up.
Perhaps the time has come for EKN to leave delicate and controversial matters such as this in the capable hands of the young professionals in Estonia and stick to cultural issues. They seem to have difficulty understanding that they no longer speak for free Estonia. We may not always agree with the government in Estonia but they were freely elected and such is the nature of democracy.
Peter16 Dec 2005 06:07
I agree with some of what you say about the EKN and cultural issues are important but if our community along with others are to be portrayed as evil Nazis because certain lobby groups want sympathy for Israel in their never ending war against the Arabs then it is the responsibility of our organizations to fight this kind of propaganda. Our votes, as well as those of other Europeans who have been slandered still mean something to politicians.
I work in a very diverse environment with representatives of many different ethnic groups. Some of my co-workers always get their way just by screaming "racism". This is the reality of the Trudeau-created multicultural Canada. The Estonian community must also adapt to this new reality so that whenever we are labelled as Nazis we should respond with charges of racism, bigotry and hate. I am sure that those who chose to slander us for political reasons will soon find other groups to target if we respond in such a way.


Maxim16 Dec 2005 12:04
"...because certain lobby groups want sympathy for Israel in their never ending war against the Arabs..."Peter-you run a big risk suggesting ideas like this one. I put it to you that the shoe is on the other foot, and that Israel bashing will come back to haunt those who speak too much evil. There is a column on the internet called Honestreporting, which gives a weekly account of the latest anti-Israel biases and distortions, thanks largely to our dear friends at Reuters and BBC. It's worth taking a look at before jumping to any conclusions such as the one above. Better luck next time..
to peter16 Dec 2005 18:37
Why should you, of all people, complain about Estonians being labelled as Nazis when have told us that you admire Hitler and wish to rehabilitate his reputation?

Estonians are ashamed of you.
Maxim17 Dec 2005 05:07
Where's the proof of your accusation?? Show us the exact words that Peter said? There is far too much liberty in practicing the art of character assasination in this paper. If you really have a personal accusation to make, at least give the accused an opportunity to respond to his words. But no-as usual, you expect to come off with a clean bill of health and Peter has to walk lamely with his tale between his legs. There is a term for the kind of deception you practice-it's called intellectual dishonesty!!
to -- maxim17 Dec 2005 09:37
What makes you think that Peter isn't free to respond?
Sometimes, you can't read. At others, you can't think.
Maxim17 Dec 2005 10:45
You know that columns and their respective commentary from this paper are not always available due to the lack of an archives section. I would be interested though, to read - apart from defending someone on the grounds of free speech - what exactly is the particular wording he has used with which you so proudly want to "nail him to the cross"?
to maxim17 Dec 2005 17:06
It seems that you are a Canadian boy who grew up in our Estonian community, became a nationalist and moved to Estonia where you are spiritually more at home. That is a nice story that warms the heart. We would like to see you live there happily to soak up that wonderful atmosphere that makes Estonia special. It would be a joy to read reports from you on a Canadian-Estonian's integration into his ancestral homeland, something similar to Viido Polikarpus' interesting and informed commentary.
Instead, you bark at us. Everything you post, if it's understandable, is inane, fatuous, or false and calculated to provoke. You are annoying, (but essentially harmless), yet too stupid to see through your venomous buddy, Peter.
I'll bet that you have annoyed more than a few Estonians with your know-it-all, listen-to-me attitude. And I'll bet that your Estonian is even worse than your English. I'm surprised that they haven't slapped the snot out of you and put you on a plane back to Canada.
Instead of lecturing and hectoring us for our edification, you should go back to school to improve yourself. Start with language-study, English and Estonian, perhaps. Follow it up with a course in logic. Round it out with some therapy. Better for you, better for us.
By the way, I saw a photo of you. It's in the dictionary, under "self-important fool".
Maxim18 Dec 2005 05:29
... for your information, now that I have read your comment and summary, I am appauled if that's the kind of screed you expect me to use as the basis to write to this paper! Don't you feel any shame whatsoever for having attempted to portray me in such a negative manner? I really fail to see one example of where I have used language of the degree of severity as you have in your response. However, just to let you know how I feel, it makes me more certain than ever that I have a duty to fight against the kind of character assassination you have carried out against me!! Couldn´t you for once please please also write something that may at least pretend to be intellectually stimulating to read, rather than just relying on what you know, which doesn't seem to be much at all in the way of ideas compared with Peter, who is always open to sharing knowledge. Finally, please accept my very best wishes to you for a Happy Christmas!
Anonymous16 Dec 2005 10:03
Peter, do I understand you to be saying that the reply to the international commision should be that they are racists, bigots and hate Estonians and are out to get us for some politcal reason?
Anonymous17 Dec 2005 04:07
I do not recall Peter ever saying he admired Hitler. Peter are you there?
Anonymous17 Dec 2005 06:53
Peter explicitly expressed admiration for Hitler several months ago when he has aggressively defending Ernst Zundel, the infamous holocaust-denier. Usually, he is subtle and hides his fascist sentiments "between the lines".
Readers may recall that he has decribed himself as a "historical revisionist" -- that's a skin-head with a high-school diploma who wants to appear respectable.
Historical revisionists uniformly admire Hitler and his objectives. They concede that he killed some jews, but nowhere near six million. Of that they are certain. But they can't seem to tell us just how many he did kill, leaving the impression that the actual number was closer to six than six million. Whatever the number, they view it as a good start to a noble objective.
To confirm this, or further investigate "historical revisionism", go to Google. Afterwards, re-read Peter's postings. You'll see that all of them are phrased by someone who pretends to be an innocent history buff but, coincidentally, they all try to make the Nazi's look good.
free speech?17 Dec 2005 08:11
A point of fact -- Peter's defence of Zundel was based on the principle of free speech.

There's no doubt about that. Fascists, like communists, defend free speech where they are not in power.
free speech?17 Dec 2005 08:11
A point of fact -- Peter's defence of Zundel was based on the principle of free speech.

There's no doubt about that. Fascists, like communists, defend free speech where they are not in power.
Anonymous17 Dec 2005 05:30
Some, especially outsiders with an axe to grind, reading the last paragraph in the EKN article could easily come to the conclusion that EKN regrets that Hitler lost the war. I do not think that EKN really means this but nevertheless EKN should clarify before those wishing Estonians ill jump on it.
Anonymous17 Dec 2005 08:26
Earlier in this very exchange, Peter hints that the late Tõnu Parming just might have been a historical revisionist. That bit of wishful thinkling on Peter's part would be profoundly insulting to Parming because there is a world of difference between a conservative nationalist and an authoritarian, nationalistic anti-semite.

God protect the reputation of Parming from admirers like Peter.
Anonymous17 Dec 2005 09:05
Peter, do we understand you to be saying that you take the side of the arab terrorist of 9-11 and Arrafat's boys against Israel? Strikes me that the arabs are out to annilate Israel and us as well if we do not convert to Islam.
Peter17 Dec 2005 21:26
You guys and girls can spend a long time going throught the archives of this site looking for the comments I made where I expressed admiration for Hitler for the simple fact that I never made any such comments. I did get into a rather long argument with this very angry person who never has anything positive, interesting of constructive to say and spends most of his time bashing Maxim for some unknown reason. He defended the Canadian goverment when they arrested Ernst Zündel for his revisionist writings about WWII. Hey Maxim, if you are reading this, is this guy (or girl) who dislikes you so much someone you used to know here who you rubbed the wrong way?
On the subject of Parming, go back and read my comment again if you did not understand it. I know as a fact that there was much concern over the articles that he wrote and some people thought that he should not be writing about such a sensitive subject. There are powerful lobby groups that would gladly jail members of our community without charges or a trial for challenging some Soviet propaganda about WW II. If you have any doubts then just ask Ernst.
On the subject of the Moslems I have stated many times that Islam is the greatest threat to the Western world at this time and I would compare it to communism during the 20s. Israel is also no friend of the West as they would like nothing better than to drag us into their wars as they have succeeded in doing by getting the Americans involved in Iraq.



Maxim17 Dec 2005 23:25
Peter, people have an uncanny habit of projecting themselves in their messages-nothing remains hidden for those who can read between the lines. So it is with our critics. The majority is with us-don't worry about that-just as long as we can remain level-headed and not be put down by people who really don't want us to comment on anything-this kind are into character assassination in a big way, and everyone can see that! Just take a look at the next response to this mail-it will look like a carbon copy of all the previous ones. An no-I don't think I have made any enemies before leaving Canada-I just think a few people are intensely jealous of me who would dearly wish be in my shoes. To them I say-better luck in the future.
Anonymous18 Dec 2005 06:40
Parming must have been quite the guy to be brave enough to write about such a contentious topic under his own name. A Google search indicates he was both a warrior against communism as well as being an intellectual.
It would indeed be great if the editor published some of his better pieces in English. Those of us that only read Vaba Eestlane would not have been aware of his articles. Too bad that he died at such an early age.
It seems that it will take the passing away of those that left Estonia on their own feet before anny meaningful and impartial discussion on this topic is possible. There simply seems to be too many skeletons and raw nerves out there. The Jews had to wander around for 40 years. Those old Estonians seem to live much longer nowadays.
Anonymous18 Dec 2005 09:09
One cannot help but compare the concluding remarks of this article to the comments made by the president of Estonia at Klooga Estonia on July 24, 2005.
President Ruutel said "I feel hurt that among the citizens of our state there were those who participated in Nazi crimes.....
As long as there are those who wish to justify the crimes committed during both German as well as Soviet occupation there is a danger that such deeds could be repeated."
Too bad EKN could not bring itsef to admit that.
.18 Dec 2005 09:35
Well said!
Maxim18 Dec 2005 10:07
Please don't get stuck in a rut with kicking the guts of the EKS. They have done nothing wrong; they hold no responsibility for things done in the past, and it is of no consequence whatsoever if they were to begin to make judgements so late in the day which have no "bite" to them anyway. The war was three-dimensional; there were those who took up arms on both the German and Russian sides, some of whom had Estonian patriotic interests at heart (however little clout they had in the end..) then there were those who were fiercely in favour of a Russian or German style of patriotism eventually winning out in their homeland, thinking that one of these ideologies will forge a respectful place in the local political landscape; and thirdly there were those poor unfortunates who were simply recruited by force into either of the abovementioned armies. The subject has proven to be so intractable as to be "solution-free", and if we don't stand by the decisions made in the past-whatever their shortfall-we will never be able to move ahead into the future. Better luck....
Zundel...18 Dec 2005 10:11
"If you have any doubts then just ask Ernst." ......Wow! You bow before a peculiar saint, Peter.

This is the guy that wrote a book describing the tropical paradise that exists in the hollow Earth, accessable from the poles and the place that Hitler escaped to, via flying saucer, at the end of WWII. Hitler will return to us one day, Zundel assures us, to save humanity from the scourge of the Jews.

Peter18 Dec 2005 12:16
Seems like you have actually read his books and may be a closet fan of his :) I do agree with you that many of his ideas are quite crazy but many other authors have also written similar books and one very well known African-American leader even claims to have flown in a flying saucer many times but that does not mean that they should all be arrested.
The point I am trying to make when writing about Zündel and revisionism is that we Estonians are revisionists and nazis in the eyes of some people who ignore tha fact that one of the allied powers, the Soviet Union, was the one that took over Estonia and unlike some other countries, Estonia never joined with Germany either because of a belief in Hitlers ideology or the hope that they would also get a piece of the pie after a German victory so we have no reason to make excuses about our past.
If it was not for the current situation in the Middle East and the need for the Isreali lobby to constantly bring up the subject of the holocaust to make Europeans feel guilty about the events of 60 years ago we would not be talking about this subject now. Most people know nothing about what happened in Armenia, Russia, China, Cambodia, Rwanda and other places where genocide took place nor do they really care to think about it unless they are interested in history.


to peter18 Dec 2005 13:09
Would you like someone to finish the job that Hitler began?
Maxim18 Dec 2005 13:09
Peter, I think you should read some highly intelligent Jewish scholarly writings on Israel v's Palestine. Good starting point would be Efraim Karsh, who has written exhaustively on the birth of the state of Israel in very objective terms. Recently, when I read about the total fabrication of that now-famous incident a couple of years ago in Palestine, where a little boy and his father were "caught in the crossfire", then the evidence today points to a complete fabrication of that fateful day's happenings-read it more thoroughly if you don't belive me-I am quite unconvinced that cutting Israel down to size, if not altogether "out of the picture" will remedy the disaster that is known as the Middle East. There is far more democracy in Israel today than even the most positive thinking Arabs desiring change for themselves could ever dream of. Understand this-the Arab world needs a scapegoat - the Palestinians - they'll fight to the death to make sure NOTHING changes in favour of those poor people suffering there. Hating Israel will only result in a curse upon yourself, should you wish to go the distance. I leave the decision to you. Better....
thank you -- Maxim18 Dec 2005 14:09
I never thought that I'd see the day!
Maxim has composed something honest and true, in clear, readable English!
God bless your good work. Let's have more of this, Maxim
Peter18 Dec 2005 15:49
I don't hate Israel and as a nationalist I have a problem with those who believe that the Jewish people do not have the right to have a homeland. I realize that there are 2 sides to every story and agree with you about the Arabs having mostly very un-democratic governments but I also find it hard to sympathize with people who colonized a whole area and drove the inhabitants off the properties that they had owned for generations and into refugee camps. I personally think that the Zionists made a huge mistake when they chose Palestine for their national state. Madagascar and Uganda were both seriously considered and would have probably been much better choices.




to -- Maxim18 Dec 2005 19:02
An honest expression of opinion has the transparancy of a clear mountain lake and, by constrast, opinions expressed for effect are opaque, like a mud puddle.
That's why I don't believe that Peter believes a word of what he just wrote to be true.
Maxim. Keep enough confidence in yourself to tell us what you honestly believe without fear. Others will sometimes disagree, but respectfully, recognizing your ethical integrity.
Maxim18 Dec 2005 22:36
Peter, it is quite true that at one point in time that at least Madagascar was an obvious option for creating a homeland for the Jews. However, in the state of panic and chaos, it wasn't the Jews who drove the Arabs out of Palestine, it was the Arab leadership itself that inadvertently duped their own people, telling them to up and leave at all costs. They sold property for peanuts just because they believed the fearmongering of their own leaders, when the whole time the Jews themselves were sending the opposite message-that there is room enough for both Jews and Arabs to live together. Some more interesting homework for you to research...But that is now a very sad and sorry case of history gone drastically wrong. I believe that in the face of this tremendous mistake, the only way for the current Arab leadership to keep face with their own people is simply to carry on a state of perpetual warfare and never ever reveal the truth of their own mistakes back then in May 1948.
Anonymous19 Dec 2005 06:33
You have to wonder about leadership that is so pre-occupied with events that happened 50 or 60 years ago that they continue to cloak themselves in embittered victimhood with no end in sight.....
on victimhood19 Dec 2005 10:11
We don't hear about the Jews that were expelled from Arab lands after the establishment of Israel in 1948. Some of those communities pre-dated the life of Christ.
I pity the Palestinians and, indeed, Arabs in general. They are the victims of their own tyrants.
Getting tired of this natter19 Dec 2005 13:53
Is the above posting about Arab, Jewish or Diaspora Estonian leadership?
Horrors, it could be all three! This may go on for a long time indeed.
Hey folks, do you think the postings will hit the century mark?
Peter20 Dec 2005 05:41
We seem to keep getting sidetracked here. In my opinion this constant slandering of Estonians by those who portray us as evil nazis is something that our community should not put up with. If younger people hear this kind of propaganda then it is almost certain that they will be so turned off that they will stay away from our activities and organizations. One only has to look at Canada's German community which was at one time such a strong and vibrant ethnic group with numerous schools, newspapers, organizations, etc. that has almost vanished mainly because of the negative self-image of German Canadians.
Maxim will probably say that we should all move to Estonia but I was born here as were most of us and my life and job are here as well. It concerns me that we must make excuses about what happened during the war but I also feel that the EKN is on the right track by explaining what really happened to other Canadians. I have often been critical of the EKN in the past and coming from me this is a real compliment.


Maxim20 Dec 2005 12:26
You will be happy to know, Peter, that I have changed my mind on the issue of coming to live in Estonia. With the steady increase of former Soviet immigrants and their descendants learning the local language and customs, as well as taking out citizenship, it seems that things are moving in a better and certainly more desirably direction than before. I understand I have made some strong statements about this in the past, but as many have commented before, I have said my piece in good faith, hoping that I could move mountains and encourage people to take on more than a casual interest in Estonia as a prospective home. Hopefully things will get back into balance themselves over time, and besides, everyone should live exactly where they want to and for whatever reasons they wish. Canada is a great country, and I'm glad to have been born there, but by the same token I'm even more pleased with my life now in Estonia. Those of you who are doing a great job keeping up the culture back in Canada, keep up the good work, including everyone at the EKN. Have a wonderful Christmas, whether you celebrate it on the 25th or a couple of weeks later (January 13th) as I will be doing.
Anonymous21 Dec 2005 12:03
EKN is doubtless delighted that both Maxim the erudite patriot in Estonia and Zundel fan Peter support them. Well done EKN!
Mike (off the rails) Rodgers26 Dec 2005 00:04

Hey! This is your lucky day. Today I’m going to show you how to pick out a Neanderthal in the crowd. Don’t be surprised, but they are all around you, really! Shhhh! Don’t stare! It’s actually pretty easy to spot a Neanderthal in the crowd. Not only do they sometimes have a heavy brow and an especially small forehead, they talk very loudly, and they are usually sporting a nationalist flag pin on their lapel. They are everywhere. You’ve seen them. But first off, we’ve got to get the terminology of some fashion items’ names down pat. May we? Great. The first item that you need to know the name of is the Hinomaru. The Hinomaru literally translates into the "Round Sun." It is the flag of Japan. Even though Japan lost World War II, Japan still uses this flag. You can see the Hinomaru above government buildings in Japan or on buses during national holidays and such. One thing you probably won’t see is your average everyday Japanese sporting one of these Hinomaru flag lapel pins any day of the year. In fact, I don’t ever recall even seeing a Japanese Prime Minister sporting one of these pins. Why? I’ll get to that in a moment. The next flag is the Nishoka. The Nishoka was used specifically by the old Japanese Imperial Navy. I personally think this design is pretty cool. You will rarely ever see one of these flags in Japan today. I guess if you go to a museum or such, you’ll find one. On national holidays in Japan you can sometimes see the Hinomaru on display in a very – very – few people’s homes, but I cannot recall even once seeing the Nishoka on public display. If you do see one of these flags on display in Japan today, that is a sign that the person displaying the flag is a nationalist. In most countries that have an educated populace in today’s modern world, being a nationalist is a sign of a poor education.

This next one is a real crowd pleaser: it’s called the Hakenkreuz. It was the symbol of the National Socialist Party of Germany from the 1920’s to 1945. I’ll bet that the Hakenkreuz was the tops in fashion back in the days when Germany was winning the war. But, today, in either of the two above-mentioned nations, you don’t see educated normal people wearing these types of things on their clothing anymore. Why? Well, the answer is obvious; wearing items like these on one’s clothing is a sign of oafish, thuggish behavior. Sporting these types of accessories tells people around you that you are not intelligentsia, that you are probably a right-winged nutcase and therefore, you have a poor education and don’t read. Admit it. I’m absolutely correct on this one, right? If you saw some Japanese guy or some German guy wearing one of these things, you’d think he were some sort of psychotic living in the past.

In fact, in Japan, this sort of bizarre behavior works great for some things: You don’t want any salesmen coming to your door? No visitors? You want everyone to be afraid of you so that no one would dare break into your apartment and rip you off? No problem. Just put a Hinomaru and a Nishoka on your door and mailbox. No one will even want to talk to you; including your own neighbors. Everyone will think you are some sort of fascist, and they will leave you alone. Because, you see, sporting these kinds of fashion accessories in a normal country full of normal people (like Japan) is a sign that you indeed are a right-winged nut and need to be left alone; if not institutionalized for your own safety.

It’s a sure bet that back in Nazi Germany there were lots of them too. It didn’t matter what was going on, they were there. Heck, what are a few dozen lost freedoms and a few major setbacks on the front to a true patriot, right? If you aren’t doing anything wrong, then what’s to fear from the Gestapo taping your phones? So what if it’s 2,500 kilometers lost on the Russian front, or a firebombing of Dresden? So what if it’s Russian troops entering Berlin? You’ve got to support the troops, right? My country right or wrong. These colors don’t run. To question the leadership is a cowardly and despicable act and truly anti-patriotic.

Am I confusing you? I shouldn’t be if you’d just stop to think about this for a moment. I must admit though, most probably a war veteran of any country should have the right to wear these types of "pledge pins."
Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.
SÜNDMUSED LÄHIAJAL

Vaata veel ...

Lisa uus sündmus