Glad you are awake and aware. The viewpoint appeared in Estonian Life, little offspring of Eesti Elu. The two have different viewpoints, the average reader may not have noticed. But Eesti Elu is the responsible unit - big daddy, so Estonian Life has to be careful that it does not arouse concerns of the bigger, nmore important figure. There you have it. A personal viewpoint, not an official editorial, wrapped up in another paper with a shall we say editorial policy desitous of not offending. Does this answer the Q? Be glad to add more, only if it does not run contrary to the impartial party line.
Oh yeah - I signed my name to the piece, am signing it here - what is yours if I may be so bold to ask? The advantages of anonymity go only so far, that may also explain the reasoning for the qualifier at the end of the piece.

Whoops - missed one point that no subject pointed out. Where did it say at the top editorial? (as your comment observes) Just wondering, is my vision failing too?

Have there been any complaints or critisism about your article from certain interest groups?

Whoever served in German army - guilty, whoever fought against commies - guilty, whoever doesn't pay for our suffering - guilty, whoever messes with Simon - guilty, guilty.