Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
Amnesty Int. They seem to have a hard time believing anything you tell them-about as hard a time as some people have believing what I tell them. But they probaby are AI supporters, so that explains that.
Maxim abuses powerful drugs that turn his brains into snot. Then he blows them out through his nose, right here, so that all of us must witness the sorry sight.
Can anyone out there tell us why?
Can anyone out there tell us why?
That's a low blow and just because Maxim begs for it doesn't mean that you should give it to him.
Maxim -- you're problem is credibility. You don't know how to gather some facts and organize them into a logical point of view.
You don't even know what a fact is. It's not something that feel, suspect or conjecture. And strong emotions about facts are unconnected to their truth or falsity.
It's time for some reflexion Maxim.
Maxim -- you're problem is credibility. You don't know how to gather some facts and organize them into a logical point of view.
You don't even know what a fact is. It's not something that feel, suspect or conjecture. And strong emotions about facts are unconnected to their truth or falsity.
It's time for some reflexion Maxim.
As usual, the intensity of my critics' concern for the real genuine problems facing Estonia are of absolutely no interest to them whatsoever. Choosing to criticize me with the degree of venom that they do, shows that it doesn't matter what happens back in the homeland, as long as Maxim can be our punching bag everything's OK. The problem is quite serious, although you wouldn't credit it from some responses here. Just a bunch of jerks who take great joy in an intellectual punchup, come what may. However, I know I have a lot of fans who support me, though it is incredibly difficult for my critics to believe.
How can we take you seriously when you contradict yourself?
Re-read the first sentence of your previous posting: ..."the intensity of my critics' concern for the real genuine problems facing Estonia are of absolutely no interest to them..." If you can't see the contradiction, then you need therapy.
Re-read the first sentence of your previous posting: ..."the intensity of my critics' concern for the real genuine problems facing Estonia are of absolutely no interest to them..." If you can't see the contradiction, then you need therapy.
Again the comments have gone off-track.
This is a serious subject and it's imperative that the world hears about the situation.
It's also important that the hypocrisy of the Russian government be known.
This is a serious subject and it's imperative that the world hears about the situation.
It's also important that the hypocrisy of the Russian government be known.
I am mystified by the lack of editorial authority in regulating reader-commentary. It's embarrassing to witness the bedlam that transpires here week after week. It serves no good purpose and it would be simplicity itself to put an end to it with minimal editorial screening.
Can anyone tell me why this isn't done?
Can anyone tell me why this isn't done?
Send an email suggesting same to the website editor...., then find cash from somewhere to have that type of diligence paid for... or go to Estonian websites to see much worse. This is nothing, when it comes to fast and free...
Yes, there is worse to be seen at some Estonian web-sites. I've also noticed that it diminished when the Postimees obliged commentators to identify themselves.
Do you believe that our stalker might be discouraged if he was identified by name? Not at all! We already know him by name. Perhaps we should supplement this with photo ID -- every idiotic and insane comment should be accompanied by a photo.
Do you believe that our stalker might be discouraged if he was identified by name? Not at all! We already know him by name. Perhaps we should supplement this with photo ID -- every idiotic and insane comment should be accompanied by a photo.
Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.