Let's look at what has taken place at other meetings that the EH Board has held :
Block Shareholders have dominated voting instead of fair representation through a " one shareholder means one vote " system. The ETCU has 714 shares/votes ; EFC has 129 shares /votes ; the Skaut Malev has !92 shares /votes :Kungla has 140 shares/votes ;Meeskoor has 115 shares /votes ; Gaidide Malev 77 shares/votes /EKN 40 shares/votes. When re-counts are requested (as per the resolution to sell EH ) They are either ignored or denied. ( If there is nothing to hide then hide nothing .)At the Requisition meeting non- shareholders were allowed to be present and vote with proxies ; mysterious technical problems occurred that did not allow anything that those who support building at the 958 property had prepared to present ,yet, funny - no problems when pro - Madison points needed to be made , amongst numerous other less than democratic occurrences. At AGMs candidates are presented and endorsed by the EH board and under this archaic system are, of course voted in (back to one share / one vote ) because it has all been pre-determined. Of course by- laws sometimes need to be changed to allow candidates to "obtain " EH shares required to be a candidate. I thought that I was part of a democratic process but, since this Madison Project has come into play
I realized that this "democracy" is reminiscent of the one that the U.S.S.R. had . How ironic and how shameful !