A Political Appeal Concerning the Territorial Integrity of the Republic of Estonia Estonian Life (1)
Arvamus | 26 Jan 2020  | EL (Estonian Life)Eesti Elu
Addressed to: European Union and NATO member states, states having diplomatic relations with the Republic of Estonia, to the United Nations, and the international general public
We will soon mark the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II (WWII). That traumatic period of history continues to weigh heavily on several countries even now, including Estonia. The Molotov- Ribbentrop Pact (MRP) – signed between communist Russia and Nazi Germany in 1939 – paved the way for WWII. We direct your attention to the fact that the Pact also ultimately resulted in numerous coerced and forcible territorial changes for a number of states and peoples of Europe.

Previously (on Feb. 24, 1918), the Republic of Estonia declared itself independent and broke free of Soviet Russia. A war of independence waged with Russia ended successfully for Estonia on February 2nd, 1920, with the signing of the Tartu Peace Treaty. By signing the treaty, Russia recognized Estonia's independence, renouncing "forever all sovereign rights possessed by Russia over the Estonian people and their territory." Having first entered into the MRP on August 23, 1939, the Soviet Union occupied Estonia on June 17, 1940, and then forcibly incorporated Estonia into the Soviet Union in August. On August 23, 1944, (and in subsequent increments), Moscow annexed 3 eastern municipalities of Viru County from Estonia, along with most of Petseri County.

Because of the war between the Russian Federation (the successor of the Soviet Union), and Georgia in 2008, and also because of the subsequent armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine beginning in 2014, the nations of the world took active notice of the illegal actions of the aggressor state and reaffirmed the right of the victim states to their territorial integrity. We direct your attention to the fact that what was experienced by Georgia and Ukraine recently had already been done in an analogous manner to Estonia 75 years earlier. The topic remains current, because the very same aggressor is attempting, after the fact, to gain legal recognition of its annexations in neighboring countries, and has now also started to attempt to justify and "rehabilitate" the Molotov-Rippentrop Pact.

Russia is now accusing Estonia of presenting "territorial claims". An excerpt from the blog of Henn Põlluaas, the current Speaker of the Estonian Parliament, is of relevance here: “Estonia has no territorial claims against Russia. We don't want a single square meter of Russian territory. All we want is to get back what belongs to us. Russia has annexed about 5% of the territory of Estonia. Thus, de facto, Russia has illegal claims against Estonia in violation of international law”.

After World War I, the task of preserving the peace was entrusted to the League of Nations in 1919. Although those expectations weren't met, mankind has placed the same expectations on the United Nations (UN), the successor to the League of Nations. We can reasonably expect UN member states who value democracy and the rule of law to openly support the expectations of Estonia for the restoration of the Estonian-Russian border that has been illegally shifted westwards through aggression, due to Soviet annexation at the end of WWII. It would not be appropriate to regard this as an issue merely between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Estonia. It also concerns the location of the eastern border of NATO and the European Union, as demarcated in the Tartu Peace Treaty, which is located in the Treaty Series registry of the UN Treaty Collection under the identifier 11LTS29.

On the 100th anniversary of the Tartu Peace Treaty, the book “A Century of the Peace Treaty of Tartu 1920-2020” was published.
/Osvald Sasko/ President, The Society for the Perpetuation of the Peace Treaty of Tartu of 1920
For more information, please contact: The Society for the Perpetuation of the Peace Treaty of Tartu, Tähe 15-35, 50103 Tartu, Estonia (Secretary's email:

Aldo.Kals2@gmail.com)

In Tartu, Estonia, on January 3, 2020

 

Viimased kommentaarid

Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
Estonia should relax and wait.27 Jan 2020 09:57
Negotiations over a new border treaty with Russia should use the 1920 Treaty of Tartu as its starting point.
That Treaty was unilaterally violated when the USSR occupied the Estonian republic in 1940 and has remained in violation, as only 95% of Estonia acquired re-independence.
Does Estonia really want the reacquisition of the territory around Narva and Petseri? For what? It's occupied by unassimilable Russians hostile to Estonians.
It might be a better idea to cede those areas in exchange for Russian recognition of Estonia's sovereignty. Alas, that's impossible while Russia remains a chauvinistic autocracy. So, Estonia will just have to wait, probably for a very long time.
Meanwhile, the lack of a border treaty is an embarrassment for Russia. It's also the border between Russia and the EU, and glaring proof that Russia lacks regard for international law.

Loe kõiki kommentaare (1)

Arvamus