From patriotism to treason, a classic case revisited (II) Estonian Life (1)
Eestlased Kanadas | 06 Jun 2020  | EL (Estonian Life)Eesti Elu
Laas Leivat


After being confronted with the woman’s signed statement alleging rape and the compromising video, Metsavas didn’t have the composure to minimize his self-inflicted damage. Rapid developments simply overtook any rational decision making.

The GRU offered to solve any problems and to cope with his panic level he willingly signed anything presented to him. The contents at the time were a blur. He couldn’t even remember them.

The GRU were masters of the situation. They didn’t press him for information about the Estonian military. He was released, not forced to remain in Smolensk, in fact not told of any further contacts. The behaviour of his recruiters helped him regain his self-confidence. He was convinced he could extricate himself from the mess.

He knew he couldn’t contact the Estonian embassy – his entanglement with the ‘police’/GRU would surely jeopardize his military career. He knew about the ill- reputed Russian legal system and its ill treatment for anyone detained. He wanted to leave as soon as possible.

The GRU kept track of his whereabouts. In Tallinn as he was leaving his mother’s house, fully one year later in 2008, a man accosted him in Russian, reminded him of the occurrences in Smolensk and his promise of cooperation. However this was not the start of his assignments. (Pikemalt Eesti Elu 5.06.2020 paber- ja PDF/digilehes)
 

Viimased kommentaarid

Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
franz07 Jun 2020 02:54

Loe kõiki kommentaare (1)

Eestlased Kanadas