Russian supreme court rejects Katyn victims' petition

Russian supreme court rejects Katyn victims' petition (1)

Archived Articles | 06 Feb 2009 | EL (Estonian Life)Eesti Elu

The Russian Supreme court has denied a petition demanding an investigation of circumstances surrounding the mass murder of Polish officers and intelligentsia by Soviet forces in WWII.

This decision nullifies the frustrated efforts of relatives of the Katyn victims to have Russian authorities clarify the crimes against humanity perpetrated by Soviet special forces. After the signing of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939 by the USSR and Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union occupied eastern Poland and arrested local the intelligentsia, government officials and the military. Thereafter the Communist Party bureau decided to kill over 20,000 of the prisoners.

Thousands of Polish and police officials were shot twenty kilometers from Smolensk in the forest of Katyn. In addition many more were killed in the cellars of the NKVD (precursor of the KGB) throughout Ukraine and Belarus.

After the retreat of Soviet forces from Poland the massacre at Katyn became a propagandistic issue. Nazi Germany's military had uncovered the Katyn mass graves and identified the NKVD as perpetrators. Moscow however blamed Nazi Germany. At the end of WWII, the "official version" was the USSR's. Poland knew the truth, but any public reference to it was forbidden by the communists in power.

The Soviet Union accepted blame on April 13, 1990, when Mihhail Gorbachov said that Joseph Stalin with the leading members of the communist party and government had given the NKVD the go-ahead to commit the atrocity. However it was not declared to be a crime against humanity in that only certain individuals of the time were directly culpable.

Russian military prosecutors had investigated the killings but ended the process in 2004 because the Katyn massacre had not been recognized as a crime against humanity or a war crime.

Earlier the Russian court did not satisfy the petitions of relatives applying for rehabilitation of the victims, explaining that the crime had expired and that such applications can be presented only by those whose human rights had been violated.

Viimased kommentaarid

Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.

Katyn06 Feb 2009 10:38

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

Loe kõiki kommentaare (1)

Archived Articles

The reverberations of Soviet totalitarianism in Finland: Sympathies and contradictions (II) (1)
Translated from Imbi Paju’s article in “Maailma Vaade” (View of the World).

This year 70 years have passed since the signing of the ...

How to Liberate an Economy
Entrepreneurs understand the importance of freedom in the workplace

Guy Sorman, TCS Daily

Brian Carney and Isaac Getz's Freedom, Inc. is a ...

Lessons from Estonia: Protecting the West from a computer attack
Väino Reinart, National Post, October 22, 2009

The cyber attacks carried out against Estonia in the spring of 2007 served as a wake-up call about ...

Opening statement by Mark Carney Governor of the Bank of Canada Press conference following the release of the Monetary Policy Report 22 October 2009
Good morning. Paul and I are pleased to be here with you today to discuss the October Monetary Policy Report, which we published this morning.

...

Welcome home
It is high time to abolish the concept of ethnic minorities
Europe.view column, Oct 22nd 2009, from Economist.com

Should the Polish ethnic ...

Moscow Patriarchate’s efforts to subordinate ‘alternative Orthodox’ undercut Russia’s future, Regelson says (2)
VIENNA, October 22 – The Moscow Patriarchate’s drive to subordinate all independent Orthodox bishops and believers to its own power vertical, an ...