The Ehatare affair has been resolved to everyone's dissatisfaction and there's no profit in a videotaped confrontation between Meiusi and his accusers. He will continue to dissemble, as he has to date.
Now it's time to protect Raivo Remmel and the Eesti Maja project. To that end, the Estonian World Review should stop printing unsigned editorials.

The opening salvo of the war on Ehatare was a series of anonymous complaints telephoned to the Ministry of Health. These continued for a year.
Work at Ehatare came to a dead halt as Inspectors arrived to assess the situation. All of the complaints proved to be baseless, but; all of them seriously disrupted the routine care of residents.
Suspicion fell upon Allan Meiusi. When asked about it, repeatedly, he refuses to confirm or deny.
His offer to bring documentation to a face to face meeting is a risible red herring -- there is no paper trail to disprove the source of anonymous telephone complaints.
Why bring this matter up, now, long after the fact? Because Raivo Remmel has become the target of similar anonymous sniping from the sidelines, probably, by people with no financial stake in Eesti Maja; and it wouldn't surprise me if Allan Meiusi was one of them.
Allan Meiusi is a tough customer. He put his butt on a hard chair and poured over Ehatare's past tax returns until he found an error, then; proclaimed tax fraud. The question surfaced at a public meeting. It proved to be a clerical error, corrected after the fact, with no further consequence of any sort; neither financial nor legal.
That clarification satisfied Meiusi, but; not the harridan who continued to circulate slander for a year. When confronted, in public, she refused to repeat it. In private, her slander began with the preamble, "Don't tell anyone that I said so, but...."
The assault on Ehatare was a team effort, mostly by friends of the dismissed employee with no parent in residence.
Similarly, the current assault on Raivo Remmel is waged by people who can't reveal their identity because they're unwilling to make a financial investment into the project. That said, they still wish to manage the project.

Since you seem relunctant to accept my offer of a one-on-one discussion on camera, it looks like we won't bridge the ocean of difference between us. If my goodfellow commentator ever wants to take me up on this offer in the future, please contact the Editor of EWR to set up a time and date. You can ask me what you want on camera and I'll answer. Just so you don't think my questions to you are "baseless", I'll bring documents to validate why I'm asking the questions I'll be asking and I trust you'll answer them fully as an authority on the subject matter. Then, at the end of the interview, the community can come to its own conculsions.