Kommentaarid on kirjutatud EWR lugejate poolt. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida EWR toimetuse seisukohtadega.
VanemadUuemad
“Müügi tingimuseks on, et Eesti Maja ostja saab loa ületada miinimum pindala künnise Broadview’l vanadekodu ehitamiseks, kusjuures see künnis ei ole eriti kõrge.” This statement is misleading and incomplete. First, the buyer was looking for 10 to 18 storeys, whereas the municipal bylaw allows for 6, and the Tulge Külla proposal is for 6. There is a backlog of years for OMB (Ontario Municipal Board) decisions under the old regime, and there is a complete standstill on interpreting the new regulations.
The Tulge Külla proposal also works together with the City Heritage designation. By contrast the buyer will need approval to demolish everything but the facade of the heritage building. Architects working for major developers will now say publicly that facades will disappear when as yet to be built buildings are torn down in future, since they are held up by their structure; opinion on facades is shifting against them.
In the neighbourhood planning study there is room and support for developing Estonian House within current bylaws, as would Tulge Külla, and strong opposition in the neighbourhood and at the Toronto Preservation Board that advises City Council, to violating them.
“Ma üritangi juttu ajada inimestega, kes Eesti Keskuse projekti suhtes omavad erinevaid vaatepilte minust endast”. This is altogether too casual an interest, and belied by action.
“Ma ei pea mitte mingil moel heatahtelisuse näitajaks, et Tulge Külla grupp ei vaevunud Eesti Maja juhatusega ühendust võtma seoses n-ö varuplaaniga. Eesti Maja juhatus sai esmakordselt sellest teada filmi linastamisel”. First, as the proverb says, what goes around comes around. The Madison project was thrust upon the community without any advance details at a meeting in English only where everyone was sworn to secrecy, and a complicated motion to give the Board unprecedented and total power put to a vote less than a month later. Then, “technical problems” with computers held up for hours a meeting of Estonian House shareholders called for to ask questions in February 2018.
“Do you have a story that needs to be told?” asks EstDocs, in soliciting short film submissions. Tartu College is now choosing the Amateur Category winner and awarding other titles of its own choosing. Who is on the jury and with what qualifications? For the Professional category there is a jury. Are amateurs less deserving? Is the community served by Tartu College as gatekeeper for stories and aspiring film makers? Veiko Parming’s concern seems to be that something got by the censor. In a previous post somewhere a reader warned that creative people will leave the community.
Rohkem ajaloost hiljem. Läheme EstDocs’ile.
The Tulge Külla proposal also works together with the City Heritage designation. By contrast the buyer will need approval to demolish everything but the facade of the heritage building. Architects working for major developers will now say publicly that facades will disappear when as yet to be built buildings are torn down in future, since they are held up by their structure; opinion on facades is shifting against them.
In the neighbourhood planning study there is room and support for developing Estonian House within current bylaws, as would Tulge Külla, and strong opposition in the neighbourhood and at the Toronto Preservation Board that advises City Council, to violating them.
“Ma üritangi juttu ajada inimestega, kes Eesti Keskuse projekti suhtes omavad erinevaid vaatepilte minust endast”. This is altogether too casual an interest, and belied by action.
“Ma ei pea mitte mingil moel heatahtelisuse näitajaks, et Tulge Külla grupp ei vaevunud Eesti Maja juhatusega ühendust võtma seoses n-ö varuplaaniga. Eesti Maja juhatus sai esmakordselt sellest teada filmi linastamisel”. First, as the proverb says, what goes around comes around. The Madison project was thrust upon the community without any advance details at a meeting in English only where everyone was sworn to secrecy, and a complicated motion to give the Board unprecedented and total power put to a vote less than a month later. Then, “technical problems” with computers held up for hours a meeting of Estonian House shareholders called for to ask questions in February 2018.
“Do you have a story that needs to be told?” asks EstDocs, in soliciting short film submissions. Tartu College is now choosing the Amateur Category winner and awarding other titles of its own choosing. Who is on the jury and with what qualifications? For the Professional category there is a jury. Are amateurs less deserving? Is the community served by Tartu College as gatekeeper for stories and aspiring film makers? Veiko Parming’s concern seems to be that something got by the censor. In a previous post somewhere a reader warned that creative people will leave the community.
Rohkem ajaloost hiljem. Läheme EstDocs’ile.
21
9Are you unfamiliar with commercial law?
The only unprecedented and total power I've noticed is that which Meiusi and a guy in the neighbourhood named Matthews think they should have over Estonian shareholders and what they do with their own money.
Call it off already, Allan Meiusi! You're starting to look like a nut!
The only unprecedented and total power I've noticed is that which Meiusi and a guy in the neighbourhood named Matthews think they should have over Estonian shareholders and what they do with their own money.
Call it off already, Allan Meiusi! You're starting to look like a nut!
14
21Samalt IP numbrilt on siin varem kommenteerinud: Kas Meiusi askeldab jälle? (07:09)
<div class="deleted_comment">Kommentaar on kustutatud EWR toimetuse poolt.
This comment has been deleted by EWR</div>
This comment has been deleted by EWR</div>
3
0Mis põhjusel on mõni kommentaar kustutatud?
15
5Juhul kui Revera otsustab "ära jalutada" Eesti Maja ostmisest (nagu kaks arendajat on juba seda varemalt teinud), siis on muidugi ka Eesti Keskuse projekt läbi. Vähemalt EM saab sel juhul teatud "valuraha", aga samal ajal tuleb tegeleda hirmkalliks läinud "due diligence" arvetega.
Mis sel juhul siis edasi saab? Tulge Külla on üks variant mida sel juhul arutada. Pole mõtet seda ründma hakata enne kui see praegu veel hüpoteetiline olukord käes on.
Keegi ei proovi ka mingit EM paralleljuhatust ülesse sättida, need on lihtsalt grupp aktiaomanikke kes unistavad teistsugusesest lahendusest.
Loomulikult on arusaadav, et selle esiletoomine ei ole EK projektile meeldiv, aga nad ei peaks selle üle muretsema enne kui EK projektiga midagi juhtub.
Mis sel juhul siis edasi saab? Tulge Külla on üks variant mida sel juhul arutada. Pole mõtet seda ründma hakata enne kui see praegu veel hüpoteetiline olukord käes on.
Keegi ei proovi ka mingit EM paralleljuhatust ülesse sättida, need on lihtsalt grupp aktiaomanikke kes unistavad teistsugusesest lahendusest.
Loomulikult on arusaadav, et selle esiletoomine ei ole EK projektile meeldiv, aga nad ei peaks selle üle muretsema enne kui EK projektiga midagi juhtub.
27
6Kommentaarid sellele artiklile on suletud.
